Political portrait of S. S. Uvarov (1786-1855): “No Russian Empire without the Russian Church”

This essay outlines the political portrait of Sergey Uvarov, one of the outstanding statesmen of the Alexander’s and Nicholas’s epochs. It so happens that until modern times the historical literature fight with Sergey Uvarov’s shadow rather than studied his works. Only the gradual reconstruction and comprehension of the conservative component of the historical process in the Russian science and literature made it possible to confidently discuss Uvarov as a politician. He had laid the foundations of an integral and fullfledged system of domestic education, on the basis of which sociocultural changes had grown in the society, serving as the initial and necessary ground for all real achievements of the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries in the field of the state-building and the development of civil society, science, literature and art. Uvarov’s worldview was close to conservative European romanticism, which attached an extremely important cultural significance to the national religion. At the same time, the object of his personal studies had been Russia and its past and present. Uvarov managed to fundamentally strengthen and expand this component in domestic education, which, in keeping with the spirit of the policy of Emperor Nicholas I, had grown into a full-fledged system under Uvarov’s direct participation and leadership. Upon reconsideration of his official and political experience during the reign of Emperor Alexander I, Uvarov suggested that his successor used the national enlightenment in its conservative model as a strategic preparation for the abolition of the serfdom in Russia. The new generation was to become “primarily Russian in spirit rather than European in education”, to study “Russian things in Russian” unlike its Westernized predecessors, and to have a moral need to free their serfs, just as the latter had to be prepared to take their freedom responsibly. The essay introduces to the academic community one of the later handwritten works by Uvarov, devoted to relations between the state and the Church in Russia, which was heretofore little or completely unknown and is important for understanding Uvarov’s historical significance as a political notionalist and statesman.

1. Andreev, A. Iu. (2009). Rossiiskie universitety XVIII — pervoi poloviny XIX veka v kontekste universitetskoi istorii Evropy [Russian Universities of the 18th — First Half of the 19th Centuries in the Context of European University History] (pp. 503–548). Moscow: Znak. [In Russian].

2. Barsukov, N. P. (1895). Zhizn’ i trudy M. P. Pogodina : v 22 t. [Life and Works of M. P. Pogodin in 22 volumes] (Vol. IX). Saint Petersburg: Tip. M. M. Stasiulevicha. [In Russian].

3. Degtiareva, M. I. (2009). Religiozno-filosofskaia mysl’ Zhozefa de Mestra v kontekste formirovaniia konservativnykh traditsii Evropy i Rossii [Religious and Philosophical Thought of Joseph de Maistre in the Context of the Formation of Conservative Traditions in Europe and Russia]. [Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophical Sciences. Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow. [In Russian].

4. Doklady ministra narodnogo prosveshcheniia S. S. Uvarova imperatoru Nikolaiu I [Reports of the Minister of Public Education S. S. Uvarov to Emperor Nicholas I]. (1995). In Reka vremen: kniga istorii i kul’tury [The River of Times: A Book of History and Culture] (Vol. 1, pp. 70–72). Moscow: Ellis Lak: Tov-vo “Reka vremen”. [In Russian].

5. Filareta, mitropolita Moskovskogo i Kolomenskogo, Tvoreniia [Works of Filaret, Metropolitan of Moscow and Kolomna]. (1994). Moscow: Otchii dom. [In Russian].

6. Lemke, M. K. (1904). Ocherki po istorii russkoi tsenzury i zhurnalistiki XIX stoletiia [Essays on the History of Russian Censorship and Journalism of the 19th Century]. Saint Petersburg: tip. Spb. t-va pech. i izd. dela “Trud”. [In Russian].

7. Nikitenko, A. V. (1955). Dnevnik: v 3 t. [Diary in 3 volumes] (Vol. 1). Moscow: Goslitizdat. [In Russian].

8. Petrov, F. A. (2003). Formirovanie sistemy universitetskogo obrazovaniia v Rossii [Formation of the System of University Education in Russia] (Vol. 4, part 1: Russian Universities and people of 1840s. Part 1. Professors). Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta. [In Russian].

9. Pushkin, A. S. (1996). Dnevnik 1833–1835 [Diary of 1833–1835]. In Complete Works in 17 volumes (Vol. 12). Moscow: Gazetno-zhurnal’noe ob”edinenie “Voskresen’e”: Izvestiia. [In Russian].

10. Shevchenko, M. M. (2002). Poniatie “teoriia ofitsial’noi narodnosti” i izuchenie vnutrennei politiki imperatora Nikolaia I [The Concept of “The Theory of Official Nationalism” and the Study of the Domestic Policy of Emperor Nicholas I]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seria 8. Istoriia, (4), 89–104. [In Russian].

11. Shevchenko, M. M. (2018). Zapiska S. S. Uvarova o krepostnom prave v Rossii (1830/31) [Note by S. S. Uvarov on serfdom in Russia (1830/31)]. Tetradi po konservatizmu, (1), 348–359. [In Russian].

12. Uvarov, S. S. (1813). O prepodavanii istorii otnositel’no k narodnomu prosveshcheniiu [On the Teaching of History in Relation to Public Education]. Saint Petersburg: V tipografii F. Drekhslera. [In Russian].

13. Uvarov, S. S. (1814). Imperator vserossiiskii [Aleksandr I] i Bonaparte [All-Russian Emperor [Alexander I] and Bonaparte]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. F. Drekhslera. [In Russian].

14. Uvarov, S. S. (1818). Rech’ prezidenta Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk, popechitelia Sankt-Peterburgskogo uchebnogo okruga, v torzhestvennom sobranii Glavnogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, 22 marta 1818 goda [Speech of the President of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, Trustee of the St. Petersburg Educational District, at the Solemn Meeting of the Principal Pedagogical Institute at March 22, 1818]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. Departamenta nar. Prosveshcheniia. [In Russian].

15. Verkriuis, Zh., Stroev, A. (2022). “Bud’ Vy riadom, ia by ne zastavlial stenat’ ni pechatnyi stanok, ni chitatelei…”. Predislovie k russkomu izdaniiu [“If You Were Near, I Would Not Make Either the Printing Press or Readers Moan...” Preface to the Russian edition]. In Prints Sharl’ Zhozef de Lin’. Perepiska s russkimi korrespondentami [Prince Charles Joseph de Ligne. Epistolary with Russian Correspondents]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. [In Russian].