The 1912 Duma Elections: The State, the Opposition and the Clergy
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-1-1-111-124
Abstract
This article deals with the political situation around the elections to the State Duma of the Russian Empire in 1912 (4th convocation). The main actors of the campaign were the government, local administration, liberal opposition and the clergy of the Orthodox Russian Church. After the 1905 revolution, the “official Church” found itself in a difficult situation. In particular, anti-Church criticism intensified sharply and was expressed now quite openly, both in the press and from the rostrum of the Duma. A consequence of these circumstances was that in this Duma campaign, for the first time in the history of Russian parliamentarianism, “administrative resources” were widely used. At the same time, the authorities failed to achieve their political objectives. The Russian clergy became actively involved in the election campaign. The government sought to use the conflict between the liberal majority in the third Duma and the clerical hierarchy. Duma members launched an active criticism of the Orthodox clergy, using Grigory Rasputin as an excuse. Even staunch conservatives spoke negatively about Rasputin. According to the results of the election campaign, the opposition was even more active in using the label “Rasputinians” against the Holy Synod and the Russian episcopate. Forty-seven persons of clerical rank were elected to the House — three fewer than in the previous Duma. As a result, the assembly of the clergy elected to the Duma decided not to form its own group, but to spread out among the factions. An active campaign in Parliament and the press not only created a certain public mood, but also provoked a political split and polarization within the clergy. The clergy themselves were generally inclined to blame the state authorities for the public isolation of the Church. The Duma election of 1912 seriously affected the attitude of the opposition and the public toward the bishopric after the February revolution of 1917.
Keywords
About the Author
F. A. GaydaRussian Federation
Fedor Aleksandrovich Gayda— Doctor of Historical Sciences, Docent, Department of History of Russia of the 19th century — early 20th century, Faculty of History, Lomonosov Moscow State University.
27-4 Lomonosovsky prospekt, Moscow, 119192.
References
1. Bayan (Kolyshko, I. I.) (1912, January 13). Liliput [Lilliputians]. Russkoe slovo.
2. Beglov, A. L. (2019). Pravoslavnyy prikhod Rossiyskoy imperii na rubezhe XIX-XX vv.: sostoyanie, diskussii, reform [Orthodox parish of the Russian Empire at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries: state, discussions, reforms] [Doctoral dissertation].
3. Varlamov, A. N. (2008). Grigoriy Rasputin-Novyy [Grigory Rasputin-New] (2nd ed.). Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya.
4. Gaida, F. A. (2014). Sovet ministrov o problemakh Pravo-slavnoy Rossiyskoy Tserkvi (1906-1914) [Council of Ministers on the problems of the Orthodox Russian Church (1906-1914)]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia II: Istoriia. Istoriia Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi, 57(2), 23-37.
5. Doneseniya L. K. Kumanina iz Ministerskogo pavil'ona Gosudarstvennoy dumy, dekabr' 1911 - fevral' 1917 goda [Reports of L. K. Kumanin from the Ministerial Pavilion of the State Duma, December 1911 — February 1917]. (1999). Voprosy Istorii, 1, 3-28.
6. Dyakin, V. S. (1988). Burzhuaziya, dvoryanstvo i tsarizm v 1911-1914 gg. Razlozhenie tret’eiyun’skoy sistemy [The Bourgeoisie, the Nobility and Tsarism in 1911-1914. The Decomposition of the Third June System]. Leningrad: Nauka.
7. Izgoev, A. S. (1912а). Dnevnik [Diary]. Russkaya mysl, (7), 152-154.
8. Izgoev, A. S. (1912b). Na perelome [At the turning point]. Russkaya mysl, (11), 167-181.
9. Kokovtsov, V. N. (1992). Iz moego proshlogo. Vospominaniya (1903-1919 gg.) [From My Past. Memories (1903-1919)]. Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka.
10. Lukoyanov, I. V. (2003). U istokov rossiyskogo parlamentarizma: istoriko-dokumentalnoe izdanie [At the origins of Russian parliamentarism: historical-documentary edition]. Saint Petersburg: Liki Rossii
11. Menshikov, M. O. (1912, January 14). Rasputitsa v Tserkvi [Sputum at Church]. Novoe vremya, 1.
12. Meshchersky, V. P. (1912). Dnevnik [Diary]. Grazhdanin, (34), 8-17.
13. Nikanorov, I. (1910, August 10). Na krayu propasti [On the edge of the abyss]. Golos Moskvy, 1.
14. Novoselov, M. A. (1912, January 24). Golos pravoslavnogo miryanina [Voice of an Orthodox layman]. Golos Moskvy, 1.
15. Rozhkov, V. (2004). Tserkovnye voprosy v Gosudarstvennoy Dume [Church Questions in the State Duma]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Krutitskogo podvorya.
16. Trubetskoy, E. N. (1908, January 8). Buran [Snowstorm]. Moskovskiy ezhenedelnik.
17. Trubetskoy, E. N. (1994). Smysl zhizni [The Meaning of Life]. Moscow: Respublika.
Review
For citations:
Gayda F.A. The 1912 Duma Elections: The State, the Opposition and the Clergy. Orthodoxia. 2021;(1):111-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-1-1-111-124