Preview

Orthodoxia

Advanced search

About Classical Conservatism and Soviet Conservatism: Similarities and Differences. (Essays on the Conservative Thought in the USSR)

https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2022-4-12-24

Abstract

In the paper, an attempt is made to define the conservatism as is. The integral conservatism involves monarchy, class stratification of the society, domination of religion, idealistic platonic philosophy, mostly agrarian economy, and focus on ancient patterns, classics and classicism in art. Conservatism emerged on the cusp of the 18th and 19th centuries as a reaction to the bourgeois revolutions (first of all, the French Revolution), which destroyed the traditional Western societies and paved the way to a modernist civilization. Conservatives differ from traditionalists and “conservative revolutionaries” in that they do not call for a “revolution against the modern world”. Instead, they seek to preserve the existing traditional structures. At first glance, the Soviet society, with its cult of progress and anti-traditional worldview, left no room for the conservatism. Yet, firstly, authoritarian traits were present in Bolshevism itself. Secondly, Russian peasants and national Bolshevik specialists brought the elements of traditional Russian culture to the Soviet project. Thanks to this, not only latent integral conservatism (A. F. Losev) became possible in the USSR, but also the partial one (M. A. Lifshitz and L. N. Gumilev). 

About the Author

R. R. Vakhitov
Ufa University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology 

32, Zaki Validi street, Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan, 450076



References

1. Abdullina, L. S. (2015). Sushchnost’ poniatiia konservatizm: metodologicheskie podkhody i funktsional’nye kharakteristiki v politicheskoi sisteme [Essence of the Conservatism Concept: Methodological Approaches and Functional Characteristics in the Political System]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 20(3), 1095–1099. [In Russian].

2. Getty, A. (2016). Praktika stalinizma: Bol’sheviki, boiare i neumiraiushchaia traditsiia [The Practice of Stalinism: Bolsheviks, Boyars and the Undying Tradition]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. [In Russian].

3. Grigor’ev, E. V. (2009). Problemy opredeleniia konservatizma [Problems of Defining Conservatism]. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 3(6), 5–17. [In Russian].

4. Kamnev, V. M., Kamneva, L. S. (2019). Fenomen sovetskogo konservatizma: istoriosofskoe obosnovanie [The Phenomenon of Soviet Conservatism: A Historiosophical Justification]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiia i konfliktologiia, 35(1), 43–55. [In Russian].

5. Minakov, A. Iu. (2011). Russkii konservatizm v pervoi chetverti XIX veka [Russian Conservatism in the First Quarter of the 19th Century]. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo gos. un-ta. [In Russian].

6. Vakhitov, R. R. (2019). Kritika pozitivizma A. F. Loseva do i posle “takticheskogo soiuza” s marksizmom [Criticism of A. F. Losev’s Positivism Before and After the “Tactical Alliance” with Marxism]. In Filosof i ego vremia: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. K 125-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia A. F. Loseva, Moskva, 17–20 oktiabria 2018 goda [Philosopher and His Time: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. To the 125th Anniversary of the Birth of A. F. Losev, Moscow, October 17–20, 2018] (pp. 392–402).

7. Moscow: OOO “MAKS Press”. [In Russian]. Vernadsky, G. V. (2000). Lenin — krasnyi dictator [Lenin is a Red Dictator]. Moscow: Agraf. [In Russian].


Review

For citations:


Vakhitov R.R. About Classical Conservatism and Soviet Conservatism: Similarities and Differences. (Essays on the Conservative Thought in the USSR). Orthodoxia. 2022;(4):12-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2022-4-12-24

Views: 301


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-9276 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2424 (Online)