Preview

Orthodoxia

Advanced search

Political Doctrines of Neo-Pagans: from the Community of Equals to the State of the Selected Fewy

https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2022-3-199-230

Abstract

Since the emergence of the phenomenon of the Soviet (later Russian) new paganism, the ideologists of the movement set out to develop their own political programs, consisting of utopian projections aimed at the functioning of nativist religious groups in the reality of a hostile/neutral environment. These plans listed as their ultimate goals the raising of paganism to the level of the state ideology and even the complete reorganization of the Russian Federation into a new theocratic state headed by a formal cast of cult worshippers: magi and sacrifi cers. The purpose of this article is to examine the central political concepts of the leaders of the Russian pagan movement of the last third of the 20th — fi rst third of the 21st centuries. The experience of Dobroslav (A. A. Dobrovolsky), who laid the foundations of this worldview for decades to come, is taken as a biographical example of the pagan political development. Dobroslav’s concept received its further development, and underwent the transformation in the course of the quest of magus Velimir (N. N. Speransky) and subsequent ideologists of the Russian religious nativism. As a result of the research, the author of the article arrives at the conclusion about the continuity of the neo-pagan political doctrine and the constancy of the central strata. Those include the organization of “their own” space in the form of self-governing (veche) communities, independent of the “outside world” and aimed at the gradually expanding infl uence up to the complete seizure of power. This can be achieved either through the strengthening and development of diasporic pagan groups (a “peaceful” evolutionary option), or through the violent overthrow of an existing state institution (a “military” coup). Other goals include creating an ethnic hierarchical system subordinate to theocratic leaders as pagan leaders of the nation and strengthening contacts with representatives of the indigenous peoples of the Russian Federation, carriers of pre-Abrahamic beliefs and with “co-religionists” from abroad. In terms of the worldview, we can see a signifi cant infl uence of eschatological views and conspiracy theories; rejection of the off icial science, political and economic systems and reliance on the author’s constructs of community leaders and individual ideologists of the neo-pagan community. It should be noted that this “set” of neopagan constants is subject to modernization taking into account the current (topical) trends in the development of the political system in Russia and the world as a whole.

About the Author

R. V. Shizhensky
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Religious Studies “North-West” of the Institute for the Humanities

56а Chernyshevsky st., Kaliningrad, 236022 



References

1. Askr, Svarte (Nechkasov, E. A.). (2021). Chernoe Satori [Black Satori]. Alföðr. Al’manakh “Vseotets”. Vestnik iazycheskogo traditsionalizma, (1), 103–104.

2. Askr, Svarte (Nechkasov, E. A.). (2021). Interv’iu ital’ianskomu zhurnalu II Primato Nazionale [Interview to the Italian Magazine II Primato Nazionale]. Alföðr. Al’manakh “Vseotets”. Vestnik iazycheskogo traditsionalizma (1), 105–115.

3. Askr, Svarte (Nechkasov, E. A.). (2021). Nabroski iazycheskoi geopolitiki [Outline of Pagan Geopolitics]. Alföðr. Al’manakh “Vseotets”. Vestnik iazycheskogo traditsionalizma (1), 132–152.

4. Bednarchik, T. R. (2014). Neoiazycheskaia religioznost’ v armii ukrainskoi narodnoi Respubliki v 1917–1923 godakh [Neo-Pagan Religiosity in the Army of the Ukrainian People’s Republic in 1917–1923]. Colloquium Heptaplomeres, (1), 110–116.

5. Dissimiliatsiia i traibalizm [Dissimilation and tribalism] (2021). In Alföðr. Al’manakh “Vseotets”. Vestnik iazycheskogo traditsionalizma, (1), 123–131).

6. Dobroslav (Dobrovolsky, A. A.). (2006).Zov Tule [Call of Thule]. S.l. Dobroslav (Dobrovolsky, A. A.). (n.d.). Prizrak Kudeiara [The Ghost of Kudeyar]. Nizhny Novgorod: Allprint. S.l.

7. Dobroslav (Dobrovolsky, A. A.). (n.d.). Volkhvy [Magus]. S.l.

8. Dobroslav (Dobrovolsky, A. A.). (n.d.). Zachem Prirode chelovecheskii mozg? Simvolika v svete Prirodovedeniia. Zagadki drevneishei istorii [Why does Nature Need a Human Brain? Symbolism in the Light of Natural History. Mysteries of Ancient History.]. S.l.

9. Eltzbacher, P. (2003). Sut’ anarkhizma [The Essence of Anarchism]. Moscow: AST.

10. Emelianov, V. N. (2001). Dessionizatsiia [Dessionization]. Moscow: Russkaia pravda.

11. Ionov, M. A., Baikova, E. A. (2021). Slavianskoe iazychestvo. Mirozdanie, obshchestvo, obriady [Slavic Paganism. Universe, Society, Rituals]. Moscow: Amrita-Rus’.

12. Jaromir. (2021). Rodnoverie — rolevaia igra s elementami slavianskogo fentezi [Rodnoverie is a Role-Playing Game with Elements of Slavic Fantasy]. Al’manakh slaviano-russkoi traditsii “Veshchii”, (1), 208–212.

13. Kreslav Zapechnik. (2021). Iazychestvo — dom so starikami [Paganism is a House with Old People]. Al’manakh slaviano-russkoi traditsii “Veshchii”, (1), 213–215.

14. Mitrokhin, N. A. (2003). Russkaia partiia: dvizhenie russkikh natsionalistov v SSSR. 1953–1985 gody [Russian Party: The Movement of Russian Nationalists in the USSR. 1953–1985]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

15. Shchipanov, I. Ia. (1983). Filosofiia i sotsiologiia russkogo narodnichestva [Philosophy and Sociology of Russian Populism]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo un-ta.

16. Shizhensky, R. V. (2014). Filosofiia dobroi sily: zhizn’ i tvorchestvo Dobroslava (A. A. Dobrovol’skogo) [The Philosophy of Good Power: The Life and Work of Dobroslav (A. A. Dobrovolsky)]. Nizhny Novgorod: Povolzh’e.

17. Shizhensky, R. V. (2015). Pochvennik ot iazychestva: mirovozzrencheskie diskursy volkhva Velimira (N. N. Speranskogo) [Man of the Soil from Paganism: Worldview Discourses of the Magus Velimir (N. N. Speransky)]. Nizhny Novgorod: FGBOU VPO “Nizhegorodskii gos. ped. un-t im. Koz’my Minina”.

18. Velimir (Speransky, N. N.). (2009). Darna: uchenie o zhizni v prirode i obshchestve [Darna: the Doctrine of Life in Nature and Society]. Troitsk: Koliada Viatichei.

19. Velimir (Speransky, N. N.). (2012). Nravstvennaia kniga: kakim rodnoveru byt’ i pochemu [Moral book: What Kind of Person Should Rodnover Be and Why]. Troitsk: Koliada Viatichei.

20. Velimir, Veleslav, Vlasov. (2007). Put’ Volkhva [Way of the Magus]. Donetsk: Kashtan.

21. Volkhv Velimir (Speransky, N. N.). (2012). Rodnoverie. Moscow: Samoteka.

22. Zinkovsky, M., Gerasimenko, E. (2008).Bor’ba prodolzhaetsia. Natsional-sotsializm kak on est’ [The Struggle Continues. National Socialism as It Is]. Kharkiv: DIV.


Review

For citations:


Shizhensky R.V. Political Doctrines of Neo-Pagans: from the Community of Equals to the State of the Selected Fewy. Orthodoxia. 2022;(3):199-230. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2022-3-199-230

Views: 390


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-9276 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2424 (Online)