Preview

Orthodoxia

Advanced search

Linguistic Nazism

https://doi.org/10.52833/2712-9276-2025-1-136-155

Abstract

This article examines issues of language policy in the context of the global dominance of the English language. The aggressive spread of English was historically rooted in the racial policies of Britain and the United States, beginning in the 18th century. Over the past two centuries, the international expansion of English, pursued by the political leadership of these nations, has led to linguistic discrimination against other peoples and cultures. The origins of this policy lie in an ideology based on racial segregation and the belief in the superiority of one race over all others. By analogy, the dominance of English as a global means of communication has resulted in the suppression or destruction of national languages. This phenomenon can be described as linguistic Nazism. As the United States expanded its zones of influence, it imposed English as the dominant language among colonized populations. English became a tool of colonial policy and the standard in education systems. The article also explores the methods developed for teaching English to immigrants beginning in the 19th century. Methods that became foundational for the global dissemination of the language. A key role in this process was played by the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA), the largest Protestant missionary organization of the time. The YMCA developed an English language teaching method for immigrants that was based on a restrictive approach that erased essential concepts such as native-language knowledge and national culture. In Russia, the teaching of foreign languages since the 1990s has been based on Anglo-American methods that introduced Protestant educational principles based on the rejection of one’s native language and culture. This aggressive imposition of Western standards in language instruction has led to the impoverishment of the Russian language and, in many cases, to the erosion of traditional values among students.

About the Author

L. V. Shchipkova

Russian Federation

Lyubov Vasilievna Shchipkova — political scientist

Moscow



References

1. Abdusalamov, M. M. (2020). Ob istokakh i dvizhushchikh silakh globalizatsii yazyka (na primere angliyskogo yazyka) [On the origins and driving forces of language globalization (a case study of the English language)]. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnye nauki, 35(2), 62–67. [In Russian].

2. Fillipson, R. (2021). Vvedenie v kontceptciyu yazykovogo imperializma [Introduction to the concept of linguistic imperialism]. Vestnik ChelGU. Filologicheskie nauki, 4(450), 124, 143–151. [In Russian].

3. Shchipkov, V. A. (2017). Smekh, taboo i drugie gumanitarnye tekhnologii [Laughter, Taboos, and Other Humanitarian Technologies]. Moscow : MGIMO-Universitet. [In Russian].

4. Blair, H. (2005). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

5. Cummings, L. (2020). The Idiom of Modernity and the Construction of the Native Speaker. In Fischer-Tiné Harald, Huebner Stefan & Tyrrell Ian (Eds), Spreading Protestant Modernity: Global Perspectives on the Social Work of the YMCA and YWCA, 1889–1970 (pp. 193–210). University of Hawai’i Press.

6. Curran, J. (2017). The Power of Biases: Anti-Chinese Attitudes in California’s Gold Mines. Journal of History, Series 2, 22.

7. Kinkead, G. (1993). Chinatown Portrait of a Closed Society. New York: Perennial.

8. Helper, H. R. (1855). The Land of Gold. Reality versus Fiction. Baltimore : H. Taylor.

9. Hume, D. (1896). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

10. Mazrui, A. A. (1997). The World Bank, the language question and the future of African education. Race and Class, 38 (3).

11. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York and London : Routledge.

12. Phillipson, R. (2016). Linguistic imperialism of and in the European Union. In Behr H. & Stivachtis J. (Eds.), Revisiting the European Union as an empire (pp. 134–163). London : Routledge.

13. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

14. Phillipson, R. (2016). Native speakers in linguistic imperialism. Journal of Critical Education Policy Studies, 14(3).

15. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1988). Multilingualism and the education of minority children. In Skutnabb-Kangas T. & Cummins J. (eds), Minority education: from shame to struggle (pp. 9–44). Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.

16. Skutnabb-Kangas, T., Dunbar, R. (2010). Indigenous children’s education as linguistic genocide and a crime against humanity? A global view. Kautokeino : Galdu, Resource Centre for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

17. Tacitus. (1948). Tacitus on Britain and Germany: A new translation by H. Mattingly. West Drayton : Penguin, 1948.


Review

For citations:


Shchipkova L.V. Linguistic Nazism. Orthodoxia. 2025;(1):136-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52833/2712-9276-2025-1-136-155

Views: 7


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-9276 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2424 (Online)