Paradigmatic Foundations and Origins of the Global Nazi Project
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2025-1-30-43
Abstract
This article describes and characterizes European Nazism as an unfinished historical phenomenon. It argues that Nazism will persist as long as the concept of the global West exists. The author points out that Russian society still has not developed a coherent and systematic concept of fascism. From the author’s perspective, Nazism does not represent an “affective” reaction to the culture of modernity, as theorists of the Frankfurt School argued, but rather constitutes the most radical and overt manifestation of modernity itself. According to the author, fascism is the generative ideology of the European modernist enlightenment project. He considers it necessary to reject the myth of Nazism as an allegedly unforeseen historical “breakdown” within Western democracy. A contemporary concept of Nazism must be resilient to liberal narratives and discourses, in order to avoid reproducing false constructs aimed at rehabilitating the core Nazi myths under altered linguistic and stylistic forms. The author emphasizes the need to lift the taboo surrounding the West’s responsibility for fascism and colonialism. This critical reorientation is essential for returning humanity to a Biblical system of values.
Keywords
About the Author
A. V. ShchipkovRussian Federation
Alexander Vladimirovich Shchipkov — Doctor of Political Sciences, Rector of Russian Orthodox University of Saint John the Divine, Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Politics and Law, Faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University
4, Krapivensky pereulok, Moscow, 127051
References
1. Adamova, N. E. (2015). Idei “isklyuchitel’nosti” v predstavleniyah anglijskih puritan i separatistov nakanune emigracii v Novuyu Angliyu (pervaya tret’ XVII v.) [Ideas of exceptionalism shared by English Puritans and Separatists on the eve of migration to New England (the early 17th century)] [Dissertation, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Saint Petersburg Institute of History of the RAS]. Saint Petersburg. [In Russian].
2. Benedict, A. (2001). Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva [Imagined Communities]. Moscow : Kanon-Press-C, Kuchkovo pole. [In Russian].
3. Nolte, E. (2003). Evropejskaya grazhdanskaya vojna (1917–1945). Nacional-socializm i bol’shevizm [The European Civil War 1917–1945.
4. National Socialism and Bolshevism]. Moscow : Logos. [In Russian]. Horkheimer, M. (2011). Zatmenie razuma. K kritike instrumental’nogo razuma. [Eclipse of Reason]. Moscow : Canon +. [In Russian].
5. Shchipkov, A. V. (2015). Tradicionalizm, liberalizm i neonacizm v prostranstve aktual’noj politiki [Traditionalism, Liberalism and Neo-Nazism in the Current Political Space]. Saint Petersburg : Aleteya. [In Russian].
6. Shchipkov, A. V. (2024). Nezavershyonnyj nacizm. Genezis, transformacii i rodstvennye yavleniya: monografiya [Unfinished Nazism. Genesis, Transformations and Related Phenomena : Monograph]. Moscow : Russian Orthodox University of St. John the Evangelist.
7. Shchipkova, L. V. (2025). Lingvisticheskij nacizm [Linguistic Nazism]. Orthodoxia, 16(1), 136–155. [In Russian].
Review
For citations:
Shchipkov A.V. Paradigmatic Foundations and Origins of the Global Nazi Project. Orthodoxia. 2025;(1):30-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2025-1-30-43