Preview

Orthodoxia

Advanced search

Nature and Typology of Different Types of Soviet Conservatism

https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2022-4-25-51

Abstract

The paper poses the problem of Soviet conservatism. What protective forces and mechanisms were inherent in the Soviet system? Since any society should have its own conservative tendencies, one can also talk about elements of conservatism in the Soviet society, culture and ideology. Nevertheless, reflections on this problem lead to an epistemological difficulty. In what sense can we talk about Soviet conservatism in general? After all, the defining worldview of the Soviet period was Marxist ideology, which was radically revolutionary and progressive. Even the word “conservative” was then perceived in a decisively negative way. Nevertheless, it is noted that in the late Soviet society it was possible to be a Soviet conservative, wishing for the preservation of the USSR but disapproving of communism and Marxism. The paper states that Soviet conservatism cannot be described as a single entity. In different epochs, different types of Soviet conservatism can be distinguished that struggled with each other and contradicted each other. In addition, the distinction between them is a bit of conditional, because all of them were permeated by the revolutionary-progressive elements of the dominant ideology or stood out against a background of the latter. The paper outlines an approximate general typology of Soviet conservatism: cultural-humanistic Soviet conservatism, pro-Leninist Soviet conservatism, Stalinist Soviet conservatism, pro-Stalinist Soviet conservatism, situational Brezhnev conservatism, and Soviet conservatism of non-Soviet authors and thinkers. It states that the USSR was largely brought to the collapse by the defectiveness and insufficiency of its conditionally conservative, protective forces and principles. It is only with a very high degree of conditionality that one can talk about the phenomenon of Soviet conservatism, understanding it as a set of transformed, unnatural, and contradictory conservative and quasi-conservative ideological currents that do not add up to a single whole.

About the Author

Yu. V. Pushchaev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy at Lomonosov Moscow State University, Senior Researcher at Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences

1, Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Chalmaev, V. A. (1968). Neizbezhnost’ [Inevitability]. Molodaya gvardiya, 9, 259–289. [In Russian].

2. Kamnev, V. M. (2009). Sovetsky konservatizm kak istoriosofskaia problema [Soviet Conservatism as a Historiosophical Problem]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina, 3, 172– 182. [In Russian].

3. Kamnev, V. M., Kamneva, L. S. (2019). Fenomen sovetskogo konservatizma: istoriosofskoe obosnovanie [The Phenomenon of Soviet Conservatism: A Historiosophical Justification]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1, 43–55. [In Russian].

4. Kochetov, Vs. A. (1970). Chego zhe ty khochesh’ [What Do You Want]. Minsk: Belarus’. [In Russian]. Lifshitz, M. A. (2004). Chto takoe klassika? [What Classic Is]. Moscow: Iskusstvo XXI vek. [In Russian].

5. Mitrokhin, N. A. (2003). Russkaia partiia: Dvizhenie russkikh natsionalistov v SSSR. 1953–1985 gody [Russian Party: The Movement of Russian Nationalists in the USSR. 1953–1985]. Moscow: NLO. [In Russian].

6. Sigal, L. I. (1991). Pokhishchenie sabinianok [The Abduction of the Sabine Women]. Vek XX i mir, 4, 12–21. [In Russian]. Solovev, E. Iu. (2017). Filosofiia kak kritika ideologii. Chast’ II [Philosophy as a Critique of Ideologies. Part II]. Filosofskii zhurnal, 10(3), 5–31. [In Russian].


Review

For citations:


Pushchaev Yu.V. Nature and Typology of Different Types of Soviet Conservatism. Orthodoxia. 2022;(4):25-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2022-4-25-51

Views: 453


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-9276 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2424 (Online)