«Dictatorship of Conscience»: Religious and Moral Foundations of the Russian Statehood According to Ivan Solonevich
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-4-238-263
Abstract
The article examines religious and moral foundations of the Russian statehood as presented by the philosopher and public figure Ivan Solonevich (1891–1953), who, following Vladimir Solovyov, defined his concept as “the dictatorship of conscience”. From Solonevich’s perspective, the specifics of the Russian political tradition consists in its fundamental difference from European feudalism. In Muscovy, the ruling class was selected according to its moral qualities, and the people’s life was based on the self-government (“the people’s monarchy”). Peter the Great ended this tradition by replacing the moral selection criterion with a pragmatic one, which led to the actual destruction of the autocracy and established the dictatorship of the nobility, substituting the people’s monarchy with European absolutism. Due to the unity of the tsar and the people based on the Orthodox faith and the Orthodox Church as the highest authority in worldly affairs, the Russian monarchy was primarily the people’s power and was never established by violence against the people’s will, while its opponents always employed the violence, i.e. murders, uprisings and conspiracies. The foundation of the Russian Orthodox monarchy was the moral feat of the people, its resignation for the sake of fulfilling the will of God. This was possible only in Russia, where the founders of the state themselves were saints. Thus, the Moscow Orthodox Tsardom had no problem with the people’s “control” over the government, which was so pressing in Europe, where outright criminals often became monarchs. In Russia, the principle of absolute trust in the authorities has always been present and has always proven its worth. Only thanks to this trust a small Duchy of Moscow could grow into a great empire. As shown by Ivan Solonevich, the obvious pragmatic effectiveness of the pre-Petrine people’s monarchy was also ensured by a very effective system of the people’s self-government, unparalleled in feudal absolutist Europe.
About the Author
V. Yu. DarenskyRussian Federation
Vitaly Yu. Darensky — Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Department of Philosophy, Lugansk State Pedagogical University.
2, Oboronnaya st., Lugansk, Lugansk People’s Republic, 91031
References
1. Beljaev, A. E. (2014). Politicheskoe svoeobrazie samoderzhavija v publicistike I. L. Solonevicha i russkih konservatorov konca XIX — pervoj poloviny XX v. [The Political Originality of Autocracy in the Journalism of I. L. Solonevich and Russian Conservatives of the Late XIX — First Half of the XX Century]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 14–1, 31–36. [In Russian].
2. Beljaev, A. E. (2016). Sravnitel’nyj analiz vzgljadov L. A. Tihomirova i I. L. Solonevicha na rol’ narodnogo predstavitel’stva kak politiko-pravovogo institute [Comparative Analysis of L. A. Tikhomirov’s and I. L. Solonevich’s Views on the Role of People’s Representation as a Political and Legal Institution]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury, 26(1), 54–57. [In Russian].
3. Cherepnin, L. V. (1978). Zemskie sobory russkogo gosudarstva v XVI– XVII vv. [Zemsky Sobors of the Russian State in the 16th–17th Centuries]. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].
4. Darensky, V. Yu. (2013). Imperija-donor: nravstvennyj podvig kak osnova rossijskoj civilizacii [The Donor Empire: A Moral Feat as the Basis of Russian Civilization]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury, 11(2), 44–51. [In Russian].
5. Hegel’, G. V. F. (1978). Politicheskie proizvedenija [Political Works]. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].
6. Klyuchevsky, V. O. (1987). Kurs russkoj istorii. Ch. II [Course of Russian History. Part 2.]. In Works in 9 volumes (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl’. [In Russian].
7. Klyuchevsky, V. O. (1989). Kurs russkoj istorii [Course of Russian History. Part 4]. In Works in 9 volumes (Vol. 4). Moscow: Mysl’. [In Russian].
8. Montesquieu, S.-L. (2006). O duhe zakonov [On the Spirit of Laws]. Moscow: Mysl’. [In Russian].
9. Panarin, A. S. (1998). Revansh istorii: rossijskaja strategicheskaja iniciativa v XXI veke [Revenge of History: Russian Strategic Initiative in the 21st Century]. Moscow: Logos. [In Russian].
10. Panarin, A. S. (2002). Strahi vlastvujushhih kak factor strategicheskoj nestabil’nosti [Fears of the Rulings as a Factor of Strategic Instability]. Nash sovremennik, (9), 193–221. [In Russian].
11. Pushkin, A. S. (1951). Istorija Petra: Podgotovitel’nye teksty [The History of Peter: Preparatory Texts]. In Complete Works (Vol 9, pp. 5–464). Moscow: AN SSSR. [In Russian].
12. Razgovory Pushkina [Pushkin’s Conversations]. (1991). Moscow: Politizdat. [In Russian].
13. Smolin, M. (2001). Monarhizm kak ljubov’. Shtrihi k portretu Ivana Solonevicha [Monarchism as Love. Strokes to the Portrait of Ivan Solonevich]. In I. L. Solonevich Nasha strana. XX vek [Our Country. 20th Century] (pp. 5–20). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].
14. Solonevich, I. L. (1954). Chto govorit Ivan Solonevich [What Ivan Solonevich Says]. Buenos Aires: Nasha strana. [In Russian].
15. Solonevich, I. L. (2001). Mif o Nikolae II [The Myth of Nicholas II]. In Nasha strana. XX vek [Our Country. 20th Century] (pp. 77–106). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].
16. Solonevich, I. L. (2010). Narodnaja monarhija [The People’s Monarchy]. Moscow: In-t russkoj civilizacii. [In Russian].
17. Tihomirov, L. A. (1998). Monarhicheskaja gosudarstvennost’ [Monarchical Statehood]. Moscow: Alir. [In Russian].
18. Tihomirov, L. A. (2003). Narodnoe predstavitel’stvo [People’s Representation]. In Cerkovnyj sobor, edinolichnaja vlast’ i rabochij vopros [Council, Individual Rule and the Labor Issue] (pp. 457–465). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].
19. Tolstoj, L. N. (1952). Zapisnye knizhki [Notebooks]. In Complete Works (Vol. 48). Moscow: Hudozhestvennaja literatura. [In Russian].
20. Vernadsky, G. V. (2006). Nacional’noe tvorchestvo russkogo naroda (Tavricheskij golos. 1919. 8 (21) dekabrja. № 112 (262) [National Creativity of the Russian people]. In S. B. Filimonov Intelligencija v Krymu (1917–1920): poiski I nahodki istochnikoveda [Intelligentsia in the Crimea (1917–1920): Searches and Findings of a Source Researcher] (pp. 122–124). Simferopol’: ChernomorPress. [In Russian].
Review
For citations:
Darensky V.Yu. «Dictatorship of Conscience»: Religious and Moral Foundations of the Russian Statehood According to Ivan Solonevich. Orthodoxia. 2021;(4):238-263. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-4-238-263