Preview

Orthodoxia

Advanced search

«Dictatorship of Conscience»: Religious and Moral Foundations of the Russian Statehood According to Ivan Solonevich

https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-4-238-263

Abstract

The article examines  religious and  moral foundations of the  Russian statehood as presented by the  philosopher  and public figure Ivan Solonevich (1891–1953), who, following Vladimir Solovyov, defined his concept as “the dictatorship of conscience”. From Solonevich’s perspective, the specifics of the Russian political tradition consists in its fundamental difference  from European feudalism. In Muscovy, the ruling class was selected according to its moral qualities, and the people’s life was based  on the self-government (“the  people’s  monarchy”). Peter  the  Great ended this tradition by replacing the moral selection criterion with a pragmatic one, which led to the actual destruction of the autocracy and established the dictatorship of the nobility, substituting  the people’s monarchy with European absolutism.  Due to the unity of the tsar and the  people  based  on the  Orthodox faith and the  Orthodox Church as the highest authority in worldly affairs, the Russian monarchy was primarily the people’s power and was never established by violence against  the  people’s  will, while its opponents  always employed  the  violence, i.e. murders,  uprisings and  conspiracies. The foundation of the Russian Orthodox monarchy was the moral feat of the people,  its resignation  for the sake of fulfilling the will of God. This was possible only in Russia, where the founders of the state themselves were saints. Thus, the Moscow Orthodox Tsardom had no problem with the people’s “control” over the government, which was so pressing in Europe, where outright criminals often became monarchs. In Russia, the principle of absolute  trust in the authorities has always been present and has always proven its worth. Only thanks to this trust a small Duchy of Moscow could grow into a great  empire.  As shown  by Ivan Solonevich, the  obvious pragmatic effectiveness of the pre-Petrine people’s monarchy was also ensured by a very effective system of the people’s self-government, unparalleled in feudal absolutist Europe.

About the Author

V. Yu. Darensky
Lugansk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Vitaly Yu. Darensky  — Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Department of Philosophy, Lugansk State Pedagogical  University.

2, Oboronnaya st., Lugansk, Lugansk People’s Republic, 91031



References

1. Beljaev, A. E. (2014). Politicheskoe svoeobrazie samoderzhavija v publicistike I. L. Solonevicha i russkih konservatorov konca XIX — pervoj poloviny XX v. [The Political Originality of Autocracy in the Journalism of I. L. Solonevich and Russian Conservatives of the Late XIX — First Half of the XX Century]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 14–1, 31–36. [In Russian].

2. Beljaev, A. E. (2016). Sravnitel’nyj analiz vzgljadov L. A. Tihomirova i I. L. Solonevicha na rol’ narodnogo predstavitel’stva kak politiko-pravovogo institute [Comparative Analysis of L. A. Tikhomirov’s and I. L. Solonevich’s Views on the Role of People’s Representation as a Political and Legal Institution]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury, 26(1), 54–57. [In Russian].

3. Cherepnin, L. V. (1978). Zemskie sobory russkogo gosudarstva v XVI– XVII vv. [Zemsky Sobors of the Russian State in the 16th–17th Centuries]. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].

4. Darensky, V. Yu. (2013). Imperija-donor: nravstvennyj podvig kak osnova rossijskoj civilizacii [The Donor Empire: A Moral Feat as the Basis of Russian Civilization]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury, 11(2), 44–51. [In Russian].

5. Hegel’, G. V. F. (1978). Politicheskie proizvedenija [Political Works]. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].

6. Klyuchevsky, V. O. (1987). Kurs russkoj istorii. Ch. II [Course of Russian History. Part 2.]. In Works in 9 volumes (Vol. 2). Moscow: Mysl’. [In Russian].

7. Klyuchevsky, V. O. (1989). Kurs russkoj istorii [Course of Russian History. Part 4]. In Works in 9 volumes (Vol. 4). Moscow: Mysl’. [In Russian].

8. Montesquieu, S.-L. (2006). O duhe zakonov [On the Spirit of Laws]. Moscow: Mysl’. [In Russian].

9. Panarin, A. S. (1998). Revansh istorii: rossijskaja strategicheskaja iniciativa v XXI veke [Revenge of History: Russian Strategic Initiative in the 21st Century]. Moscow: Logos. [In Russian].

10. Panarin, A. S. (2002). Strahi vlastvujushhih kak factor strategicheskoj nestabil’nosti [Fears of the Rulings as a Factor of Strategic Instability]. Nash sovremennik, (9), 193–221. [In Russian].

11. Pushkin, A. S. (1951). Istorija Petra: Podgotovitel’nye teksty [The History of Peter: Preparatory Texts]. In Complete Works (Vol 9, pp. 5–464). Moscow: AN SSSR. [In Russian].

12. Razgovory Pushkina [Pushkin’s Conversations]. (1991). Moscow: Politizdat. [In Russian].

13. Smolin, M. (2001). Monarhizm kak ljubov’. Shtrihi k portretu Ivana Solonevicha [Monarchism as Love. Strokes to the Portrait of Ivan Solonevich]. In I. L. Solonevich Nasha strana. XX vek [Our Country. 20th Century] (pp. 5–20). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].

14. Solonevich, I. L. (1954). Chto govorit Ivan Solonevich [What Ivan Solonevich Says]. Buenos Aires: Nasha strana. [In Russian].

15. Solonevich, I. L. (2001). Mif o Nikolae II [The Myth of Nicholas II]. In Nasha strana. XX vek [Our Country. 20th Century] (pp. 77–106). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].

16. Solonevich, I. L. (2010). Narodnaja monarhija [The People’s Monarchy]. Moscow: In-t russkoj civilizacii. [In Russian].

17. Tihomirov, L. A. (1998). Monarhicheskaja gosudarstvennost’ [Monarchical Statehood]. Moscow: Alir. [In Russian].

18. Tihomirov, L. A. (2003). Narodnoe predstavitel’stvo [People’s Representation]. In Cerkovnyj sobor, edinolichnaja vlast’ i rabochij vopros [Council, Individual Rule and the Labor Issue] (pp. 457–465). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].

19. Tolstoj, L. N. (1952). Zapisnye knizhki [Notebooks]. In Complete Works (Vol. 48). Moscow: Hudozhestvennaja literatura. [In Russian].

20. Vernadsky, G. V. (2006). Nacional’noe tvorchestvo russkogo naroda (Tavricheskij golos. 1919. 8 (21) dekabrja. № 112 (262) [National Creativity of the Russian people]. In S. B. Filimonov Intelligencija v Krymu (1917–1920): poiski I nahodki istochnikoveda [Intelligentsia in the Crimea (1917–1920): Searches and Findings of a Source Researcher] (pp. 122–124). Simferopol’: ChernomorPress. [In Russian].


Review

For citations:


Darensky V.Yu. «Dictatorship of Conscience»: Religious and Moral Foundations of the Russian Statehood According to Ivan Solonevich. Orthodoxia. 2021;(4):238-263. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-4-238-263

Views: 342


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-9276 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2424 (Online)