Konstantin Leontiev’s Concept of Byzantism as a Social Ideal and Modern Russia
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-3-213-241
Abstract
The article discusses the concept of byzantism developed by the prominent Russian notionalist Konstantin Leontiev and its signifi cance for modern Russia. A counterintuitive conclusion can be drawn on how much relevance Leontiev’s ideas still hopelessly retain for understanding the peculiarities of modern Russia, its cultural and historical type and uniqueness. The beginning states the obvious reason to turn to Leontiev’s ideas today: a number of his predictions or prophecies have come true in the history of the twentieth century. In terms of, so to speak, predictive eff ectiveness, he had no match among Russian notionalists. Then follows the consideration of Leontiev’s concept of byzantism. Leontiev deepened the generally accepted idea of Russia being Byzantium’s religious successor and comprehensively rethought it from the coherent cultural-historical and religious-political perspective. In a nutshell, one could say that the basic theses in his concept of byzantism contained three all-embracing points: the Orthodoxy and the Tsar, or the Eastern Christianity and the autocracy, and their religious and political union. This social ideal possesses distinct external (despotism, various social constraints and inequality) and internal (intense inner spiritual life) sides. Though they come as the two sides forming an integral unit, the second, internal side is more important and fundamental than the fi rst, external one. The necessary condition of byzantism as a cultural and historical type at the personal level is also noted. The author argues the existence of a kind of unspoken and hybrid byzantism that even today continues to preserve and defi ne the uniqueness of Russia. It is represented by, fi rst of all, an unspoken alliance of quasi-monarchical presidential power, when the president comes to power by formal and democratic way, but cannot be democratically evicted out of his post. A strong authoritarian government is impossible without the internal willingness of the people to obey the “party in power” as long as it maintains its authority. Among other things, this kind of power is necessary to keep together diff erent peoples, ethnic groups and regions of Russia with their diff erent cultures and traditions. While this national diversity threatens Russia with disintegration, it is, on the other hand, the key to its vitality and its complex fl owering. Secondly, it is represented by an important social role of religions being traditional for Russia — mainly Orthodoxy and the Russian Orthodox Church, and, accordingly, traditional moral values in the life of the society.
About the Author
Yu. V. PushchaevRussian Federation
Yuri V. Pushchaev — Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy at Lomonosov Moscow State University, Senior Researcher at Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Editor of the “Orthodoxia” journal
1, Leninskie gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Berdyaev, N. A. (1995). Leontiev — filosof reaktsionnoi romantiki [Leontiev — the Philosopher of Reactionary Romanticism]. In K. N. Leontiev: PRO ET CONTRA (Vol. 1, pp. 208–234). St. Petersburg: RKhGA. [In Russian].
2. Fetisenko, O. L. (2012). Geptastilisty: Konstantin Leontiev, ego sobesedniki i ucheniki (Idei russkogo konservatizma v literaturno-khudozhest vennykh i publitsisticheskikh praktikakh vtoroi poloviny XIX — pervoi chetverti XX veka) [Heptastilists: Konstantin Leontiev, His Interlocutors and Students (Ideas of Russian Conservatism in Literary, Artistic and Journalistic Practices of the Second Half of the XIX — First Quarter of the XX Century)]. St. Petersburg: Pushkinsky Dom. [In Russian].
3. Korolkov, A. A. (1991). Prorochestva Konstantina Leontieva [The Prophecies of Konstantin Leontiev]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterburg. unta. [In Russian].
4. Kozlov, A. S. (2017). Sovremennaia anglo-amerikanskaia istoriografiia o politike SSSR v 20–30-kh gg. kak proiavlenii “vizantizma” [Modern Anglo-American Historiography on the Policy of the USSR in the 20-30s as a Manifestation of “Byzantism”]. In Epokha sotsialisticheskoi rekonstruktsii: idei, mify i programmy sotsial’nykh preobrazovany: sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pp. 40–48). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta. [In Russian].
5. Kremnev, G. B. (1995). Konstantin Leontiev i russkoe budushchee: k 100-letiiu so dnia smerti [Konstantin Leontiev and the Russian Future: to the 100th Anniversary of his Death]. In K. N. Leontiev: PRO ET CONTRA (Vol. 2, pp. 681–686). St. Petersburg: RKhGA. [In Russian].
6. Leontiev, K. N. (1996). Chem i kak liberalizm nash vreden [By What and How Our Liberalism is Harmful]. In Vostok, Rossiia i Slavianstvo (pp. 267–278). Moscow: Respublika. [In Russian].
7. Leontiev, K. N. (2005). Pis’ma otshel’nika. Nashe bolgarobesie [Letters of a Hermit. Our Bolgarobesie]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12 tomakh [Complete Collection of Works and Letters: in 12 Volumes] (Vol. 7, book 1, pp. 539–545). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. [In Russian].
8. Leontiev, K. N. (2005). Vizantizm i slavianstvo [Byzantism and Slavyanism]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12 tomakh [Complete Collection of Works and Letters: in 12 Volumes] (Vol. 7, book 1, pp. 300–443). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. (Original work published 1876). [In Russian].
9. Leontiev, K. N. (2007). Nad mogiloi Pazukhina [Over the Grave of Pazukhin]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12 tomakh [N. Complete Collection of Works and Letters: in 12 Volumes] (Vol. 8, book 1, pp. 445–460). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. [In Russian].
10. Leontiev, K. N. (2007). Plody natsional’nykh dvizhenii na pravoslavnom Vostoke [The Results of National Movements in the Orthodox East]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12 tomakh [Leontiev K. N. Complete Collection of Works and Letters: in 12 Volumes] (Vol. 8, book 1, pp. 549–624). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. [In Russian].
11. Leontiev, K. N. (2007). Sredny evropeets kak ideal i orudie vsemirnogo razrusheniia [The Average European as an Ideal and Instrument of World Destruction]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12 tomakh [Complete Collection of Works and Letters: in 12 Volumes] (Vol. 8, book 1, pp. 159–233). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. [In Russian].
12. Leontiev, K. N. (2007). Vladimir Solovyov protiv Danilevskogo [Vladimir Solovyov v. Danilevsky]. In Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem v 12 tomakh [Complete Collection of Works and Letters: in 12 Volumes] (Vol. 8, book 1, pp. 316–417). St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. [In Russian].
13. Lewis, K. S. (2020). Prosto khristianstvo [Just Christianity]. In Lewis K. S. Khristianstvo (pp. 109–320). Moscow: AST. [In Russian].
14. Makovitsky, D. P. (1979). Yasnopolyanskie zapiski [Yasnopolyanskie zapiski]. In Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 90: U Tolstogo. 1904–1910: “Iasnopolianskie zapiski” D. P. Makovitskogo. Kn. 1: 1904–1905. Moscow: AN SSSR. In-t mirovoi lit. im. A. M. Gorkogo. [In Russian].
15. Theophan Zatvornik. (2009). Pravoslavie i nauka. Rukovodstvennaia kniga izrecheny i poucheny [Orthodoxy and Science. The Guiding Book of Sayings and Teachings]. Moscow: Danilov muzhskoi monastyr’. Danilovsky blagovestnik. [In Russian].
16. Tikhomirov, L. A. (1997). Russkie idealy i K. N. Leontiev [Russian Ideals and K. N. Leontiev]. In Kritika demokratii (pp. 505–516). Moscow: Izd-vo zhurnala “Moskva”. [In Russian].
17. Trubetskoy, S. N. (1995). Razocharovannyi slavianofil [Disappointed Slavophile]. In K. N. Leontiev: PRO ET CONTRA (Vol. 1, pp. 123–159). St. Petersburg: RKhGA. [In Russian].
18. V. V. Rozanov i K. N. Leontiev: materialy neizdannoi knigi “Literaturnye izgnanniki”, perepiska, neopublikovannye teksty, stat’i o K. N. Leontieve, kommentarii [V. V. Rozanov and K. N. Leontiev: Materials of the Unpublished Book “Literary Exiles”, Correspondence, Unpublished Texts, Articles about K. N. Leontiev, Comments]. (2014). St. Petersburg: Rostok. [In Russian].
Review
For citations:
Pushchaev Yu.V. Konstantin Leontiev’s Concept of Byzantism as a Social Ideal and Modern Russia. Orthodoxia. 2021;(3):213-241. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2021-3-213-241