The Church Council of Polotsk (1839): Ecclesiological Considerations
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-3-54-79
Abstract
The article provides an analysis of the ecclesiological principles outlined in the conciliar petition of the Church Council of Polotsk in 1839. The necessity of considering them is justified to understand the essence of the conciliar decision adopted and the use of appropriate terminology. This methodological approach is coupled with an examination of the historical context surrounding the abolition of the union. Attention is focused on the union in terms of subordination to the Pope, which involved the acknowledgment of all the aspects of the Catholic faith and had a negative impact on the preservation of traditional rituals and Eastern spirituality within the union. Conversely, the restoration of Orthodox worship resulted in the revitalization of church self-awareness, aiding the Uniates in rediscovering their identity and emerging from a subordinate and oppressed state. The leadership qualities exhibited by Bishop Joseph (Semashko) and the younger generation of Uniate priests, in particular, were instrumental in facilitating this process. The article also elucidates why the conciliar petition of the Church Council of Polotsk acknowledged the status of the Orthodox church without directly addressing the renunciation of the Roman pope and Catholic dogma. Instead, it focused on external dependence and adverse circumstances that had a detrimental impact on church life within the union. The corresponding acknowledgment of Orthodoxy in the Lithuanian and Belarusian territories was conveyed in the response letter from the Holy Synod. This letter acknowledged Uniate bishops in their rightful positions, obviating the need for any formal act of joining the Church. As a result, the author concluded that the theology of the Church Council of Polotsk in 1839 woud most accurately be defined as the ecclesiology of the reunification of the disparate parts of the Russian Church. Only in this regard can the decision taken at it be recognized as canonically justified and legitimate.
About the Author
A. S. Khoteev
Institute of History of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Priest Alexei S. Khoteev — Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher
1, Akademicheskaya str., Minsk, Belarus, 220072
References
1. Antony (Zubko), Archbishop. (2019). O Greko-Uniatskoi Tserkvi v Zapadnom krae Rossii [About the Greek Uniate Church in the Western Region of Russia]. Minsk : Medial. [In Russian].
2. Vasily (Luzhinsky), Archbishop. (1881). Zapiski o vossoedinenii greko-uniatskogo dukhovenstva i naroda v Belorussii i na Volyni s Pravoslavnoi Tserkov’iu [Notes on the Reunification of the Greek Uniate Clergy and People in Belarus and Volhynia with the Orthodox Church]. Russky arkhiv, book 2, (4), 380–387. [In Russian].
3. Vasily (Luzhinsky), Archbishop. (2019). Zapiski [The Notes]. Minsk : Medial. [In Russian].
4. Iosif (Semashko), Metropolitan. (1883). Zapiski Iosifa mitropolita Litovskogo, izdannye Imperatorskoiu Akademiei nauk po zaveshchaniiu avtora: v 3 t. [The Notes of Joseph Metropolitan of Lithuania, Published by the Imperial Academy of Sciences According to the Will of the Author. In 3 Volumes] (Vol. 1). Saint Petersburg : Tip. Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk. [In Russian].
5. Iosif (Semashko), Metropolitan. (1883). Zapiski Iosifa mitropolita Litovskogo, izdannye Imperatorskoiu Akademiei nauk po zaveshchaniiu avtora: v 3 t. [The Notes of Joseph Metropolitan of Lithuania, Published by the Imperial Academy of Sciences According to the Will of the Author. In 3 Volumes] (Vol. 2). Saint Petersburg : Tip. Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk. [In Russian].
6. Maleev, G., protodeacon. (2009). Polotsky tserkovnyi Sobor 1839 g. : kanonicheskie aspekty [The Polotsk Church Council of 1839 : Canonical Aspects]. In Khrystsіianstva u gіstarychnym lese belaruskaga naroda. Chastka 1 (pp. 285–291). Grodna. [In Russian].
7. Pamiatniki polemicheskoi literatury v Zapadnoi Rusi [Monuments of Polemical Literature in Western Russia] (book 2, 1818) (1882). Saint Petersburg. [In Russian].
8. Romanchuk, A., Archpriest. (2018). Vysokopreosviashchennyi Iosif (Semashko), mitropolit Litovsky i Vilensky: ocherk zhizni i tserkovno-obshchestvennoi deiatel’nosti [His Eminence Joseph (Semashko), Metropolitan of Lithuania and Vilna: an Essay on Life and Church and Social Activities]. Moscow, Minsk : Izdanie obshchestva liubitelei tserkovnoi istorii. [In Russian].
9. Uniia v dokumentakh : sb. [Union in Documents: Collection] (1997). Minsk : Luchi Sofii. [In Russian]
10. Khomiakov, A. S. (1886). Polnoe sobranie sochineny: v 2 t. [Complete Works. In 2 Volumes] (Vol. 2). — Moscow : Universitetskaia tip. [In Russian].
11. Khoteev, A. S. (2018). Uniia 1596 goda i vossoedinenie 1839 goda: printsipy i usloviia [The Union of 1596 and the Reunification of 1839: Principles and Conditions]. Aspekt, (2), 3–12. [In Russian].
12. Sergy (Gaek), Archimandrite, Sapunko, O. (2009). Tsarkoўny z’ezd u Polatsku 1839 g. — pytanne pra iago kananіchnasts’ [The Church Congress in Polotsk in 1839-the Question of its Canonicity]. In Khrystsіianstva u gіstarychnym lese belaruskaga naroda. Chastka 1 (pp. 301–305). Grodna. [In Belarusian].
13. Denzinger, H. (2007). Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus et morum [Handbook of Symbols Definitions and Clarifications on Facts and Behaviors]. Freiburg. [In Latin].
14. Documenta unionis Berestensis ejusque auctorum [Documents of the Union of Brest and its Promoters]. (1970). In Analecta OBSM (Section III, Series II). Romae. [In Latin].
15. Harasiewicz, M. (1862). Annales Ecclesiae Ruthenae [Chronicle of The Church of Ruthen]. Leopoli. [In Latin].
16. Kulczynski, I. (1733). Specimen Ecclesiae Ruthenicae [Ideal for the Ruthenic Church]. Romae. [In Latin].
Review
For citations:
Khoteev A.S. The Church Council of Polotsk (1839): Ecclesiological Considerations. Orthodoxia. 2024;(3):54-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-3-54-79
Views:
106
Email this article 