The Theological Position of Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) in the Dispute over Sophiology
https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-80-105
Abstract
This article attempts to assess the theological significance of two “Ukazes” issued by Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) in 1935 against the Sophiology of Archpriest Sergius Bulgakov and signed by members of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church. It is noted that Metropolitan Sergius insightfully and accurately exposes the main nerve of Sophiology in terms of the methodological problem of mixing philosophical and theological approaches. His own theological approach is based on the distinction between the Dogmatic Idea (dogma), eternally unchanging and self-identical, and the theological attempts of human thought to grasp certain aspects of the dogma, far from exhausting the mysterious fullness of the dogma and certainly not claiming to expand (add) its semantic structure. The article also traces the changing and enriching position of Metropolitan Sergius regarding the dogma of redemption over more than 35 years after defending his famous master’s work “The Orthodox Doctrine of Salvation”. Even before the main critical work of St. Seraphim (Sobolev) towards Metropolitan Sergius was published, these “Ukazes” already present an understanding of the doctrine of redemption that includes both subjective and objective aspects of redemption. As known, the absence of the latter aspect in the early writings of Metropolitan Sergius was criticized. The views presented in the polemic with Sophiology demonstrate the organic growth and deepening of Metropolitan Sergius’ thought, outlining certain accents that will later become the main directions of Orthodox soteriology in the 20th century.
About the Author
N. V. Kasyarum
Kostroma Theological Seminary
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Hieromonk Nikon (N. V. Kasyarum) — Magister of Theology, Lecturer,
26/37, Simanovsky Street, Kostroma, 156000.
References
1. Athanasius the Great, saint. (1903). Poslanie o Soborakh, byvshikh v Arimine italiiskom i v Selevkii isavriiskoi [Epistle on the Synods that Were in Ariminum Italii and in Seleucia Isauria]. In Tvoreniia izhe vo sviatykh ottsa nashego Afanasiia Velikago, arkhiepiskopa Aleksandriiskago (Part 3, pp. 92–165). Sviato-Troitskaia Sergieva lavra. [In Russian].
2. Bibliia. Knigi Sviashchennogo Pisaniia Vetkhogo i Novogo Zaveta [The Bible. Books of Holy Scripture of the Old and New Testaments.]. (2013). Moscow : Rossiiskoe Bibleiskoe obshchestvo. [In Russian].
3. Bulgakov, S. N., Archpriest. (1933). Agnets Bozhy. O Bogochelovechestve. Chast’ 1 [The Lamb of God. About God-manhood. Part 1]. Paris : YMCA PRESS. [In Russian].
4. Bulgakov, S. N., Archpriest. (2021). Tsentral’naia problema sofiologii [The Central Problem of Sophiology]. In S. N. Bulgakov: pro et contra, antologiia (pp. 198–202). Saint Petersburg : RKhGA. [In Russian].
5. Bulgakov, S., Archpriest. (1997). Dogmat i dogmatika [Dogma and dogmatics]. In Zhivoe predanie. Pravoslavie v sovremennosti (pp. 8–25). Moscow. [In Russian].
6. Bulgakov S., Archpriest. (1935). Dokladnaia zapiska, predstavlennaia v oktiabre 1935 g. Ego Vysokopreosviashchenstvu mitropolitu Evlogiiu professorom prot. Sergiem Bulgakovym [A Memorandum Submitted in October 1935. To His Eminence Metropolitan Eulogius, by Professor Archpriest Sergius Bulgakov]. In O Sofii Premudrosti Bozhiei. Ukaz Moskovskoi Patriarkhii i dokladnye zapiski prof. prot. Sergiia Bulgakova mitropolitu Evlogiiu (pp. 18–51). Paris. [In Russian].
7. Gnedich P., Archpriest. (2007). Dogmat iskupleniia v russkoi bogoslovskoi nauke (1893–1944) [The Dogma of Redemption in Russian Theological Science (1893–1944)]. Moscow : Izd-vo Sretenskogo monastyria. [In Russian].
8. Gregory of Nazianzus, saint. (2007). Slovo 29. O bogoslovii tret’e, o Boge Syne pervoe [Word 29. About Theology the Third, about God the Son the First]. In Tvoreniia : v 2 t. (Vol. 1, pp. 351–363). Moscow : Sibirskaia Blagozvonnitsa. [In Russian].
9. Gregory of Nyssa, saint. (1863). Oproverzhenie Evnomiia [Refutation of Eunomius]. In Tvoreniia. Chast’ 5 (pp. 8–500). Moscow. [In Russian].
10. Dillon J. (2002). Srednie platoniki. 80 g. do n. e. — 220 n. e. [The Middle Platonists. 80 B. C. to 220 A. D.]. Saint Petersburg : Izd-vo Olega Abyshko; Aleteiia. [In Russian].
11. Zapiski peterburgskikh Religiozno-filosofskikh sobrany (1901–1903 gg.) [Notes of the St. Petersburg Religious and Philosophical Meetings (1901–1903)] (2005). Moscow: Respublika. [In Russian].
12. John of Damascus, saint. (2003). Tochnoe izlozhenie pravoslavnoi very [The Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith]. Moscow. [In Russian].
13. John of Damascus, saint. (1913). Filosofskie glavy [Philosophical Chapters]. In Polnoe sobranie tvoreny sv. Ioanna Damaskina (Vol. 1, pp. 47–121). Saint Petersburg. [In Russian].
14. Klimov, A. E. (2003). G. V. Florovsky i S. N. Bulgakov. Istoriia vzaiootnoshenii v svete sporov o sofiologii [G. V. Florovsky and S. N. Bulgakov. The History of Mutual Relations in the Light of Disputes about Sophiology]. In S. N. Bulgakov: Religiozno-filosofsky put’ (pp. 86–114). Moscow : Russky put’. [In Russian].
15. Lossky, V. N. (2007). Predanie i predaniia [Tradition and traditions]. In Bogovidenie (pp. 424–447). Minsk. [In Russian].
16. Lossky, V. N. (2007). Spor o Sofii [Dispute about Sofia]. In Bogovidenie (pp. 128–201). Minsk. [In Russian].
17. M. P. (1998). K voprosu o tak nazyvaemom “edinolichnom mnenii” mitropolita Sergiia [On the Question of the so-called “Sole Opinion” of Metropolitan Sergius]. Simvol, (39), 151–160. [In Russian].
18. Meyendorff, J., Archpriest. (2013). Khristos kak Spasitel’ v uchenii Vostochnoi Tserkvi [Christ as the Savior in the Teaching of the Eastern Church]. In Paskhal’naia taina: stat’i po bogosloviiu (pp. 170–193). Moscow : Eksmo, PSTGU. [In Russian].
19. Nikon (Kasyarum), Hieromonk. (2020). Predposylki dogmaticheskoi metodologii: ot mitr. Makariia (Bulgakova) k Vl. Solov’evu [Prerequisites of Dogmatic Methodology: from Mitr. Makariya (Bulgakov) to Vl. Solovyov]. Khristianskoe chtenie, (6), 59–71. [In Russian].
20. Serafim (Sobolev), Archbishop. (1943). Iskazhenie pravoslavnoi istiny v russkoi bogoslovskoi mysli [The Distortion of Orthodox Truth in Russian Theological Thought]. Sofiia. [In Russian].
21. Sergius (Stragorodsky), Archimandrite. (1898). Pravoslavnoe uchenie o spasenii [The Orthodox Doctrine of Salvation]. Kazan. [In Russian].
22. Sergius (Stragorodsky), Metropolitan. (1947). K voprosu o zapadnom pravoslavii [On the Question of Western Orthodoxy]. In Patriarkh Sergy i ego dukhovnoe nasledstvo (pp. 72–76). Moscow. [In Russian].
23. Silvestr (Malevansky), Bishop. (2008). Opyt pravoslavnogo dogmaticheskogo bogosloviia : v 5 t. [The Experience of Orthodox Dogmatic Theology: in 5 Volumes] (Vol. 1). Saint Petersburg. [In Russian].
24. Ukaz Moskovskoi Patriarkhii Preosviashchennomu mitropolitu Litovskomu i Vilenskomu Elevferiiu. № 1651 [Decree of the Moscow Patriarchate to His Grace Metropolitan Eleuthery of Lithuania and Vilna. No 1651]. (2007). In Lossky V. N. Bogovidenie (pp. 202–215). Minsk. [In Russian].
25. Ukaz Moskovskoi Patriarkhii Preosviashchennomu mitropolitu Litovskomu i Vilenskomu Elevferiiu. № 2267 [Decree of the Moscow Patriarchate to His Grace Metropolitan Eleuthery of Lithuania and Vilna. No. 2267]. (1998). Simvol, (39), 174–186. [In Russian].
26. Florovsky, G., Archpriest. (2002). Bogoslovskie otryvki [Theological passages]. In Vera i kul’tura (pp. 441–459). Saint Petersburg. [In Russian].
27. Florovsky, G., Archpriest. (2000). O smerti krestnoi [On the Death on the Cross]. In Izbrannye bogoslovskie stat’i. (pp. 85–120). Moscow. [In Russian].
28. Florovsky, G., Archpriest. (2000). Etos Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi [The Ethos of the Orthodox Church]. In Izbrannye bogoslovskie stat’i (pp. 263–279). Moscow. [In Russian].
29. Khondzinsky, P., Archpriest. (2014). “Pravoslavnoe uchenie o spasenii” arkhimandrita Sergiia (Stragorodskogo) i ego kritika sviashchennoispovednikom Viktorom (Ostrovidovym) i arkhiepiskopom Serafimom (Sobolevym) [“The Orthodox Doctrine of Salvation” by Archimandrite Sergius (Stragorodsky) and His Criticism by the Priest Victor (Ostrovidov) and Archbishop Seraphim (Sobolev)]. Vestnik PSTGU, (2), 98–113. [In Russian].
Review
For citations:
Kasyarum N.V. The Theological Position of Metropolitan Sergius (Stragorodsky) in the Dispute over Sophiology. Orthodoxia. 2024;(1):80-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53822/2712-9276-2024-1-80-105
Views:
108
Email this article 